Meghan Markle, Duchess of Sussex, has faced criticism from royal experts for continuing to use her royal title despite stepping back from senior royal duties. The scrutiny follows a recent Harper’s Bazaar interview, during which Meghan reportedly requested to be formally introduced as “Meghan, Duchess of Sussex,” a move some specialists described as inconsistent with traditional royal protocol.

Hilary Fordwich, a royal commentator, suggested that Meghan’s actions were “deliberate,” emphasizing that she understands the influence and prestige associated with her royal status. Another expert, Richard Fitzwilliams, noted that while using the title in a private setting may seem harmless, employing it publicly can be interpreted as leveraging royal authority for personal or commercial benefit.

Kinsey Schofield, a commentator on royal affairs, highlighted previous instances where Meghan signed gifts and correspondence with the royal style “HRH Meghan, Duchess of Sussex.” Such acts, according to critics, contribute to maintaining public attention and promoting her personal brand, even though she no longer performs official royal duties.

The debate raises broader questions about the boundaries of royal privilege and the responsibilities attached to a former royal title. While Meghan’s continued use of her title has sparked public discussion, it also underscores the complex dynamics between personal branding and royal tradition in the post-royal lives of former senior royals.

Experts caution that her approach to using the title could have long-term implications for public perception of the monarchy, particularly in how former royals navigate visibility, influence, and professional pursuits outside royal obligations.